Hi,
I’m looking for some generic NAS advice. The scenario is that I have set up a FreeNAS NAS in a small school and so I have a few user names that don’t change much (staff) and a lot of users that would change a lot (students). The question is how best to implement this. My original thinking was to use generic names (‘Administrator’ (i.e. me), ‘Principal’, ‘Teacher’, ‘Assistant’, ‘Student’) and create appropriate shares (using the same names, plus a ‘Common’) with permissions across the different shares. Reading that list from left to right, each one on the left can access each of the ones on their right – so ‘Administrator’ can see all the shares and ‘Student’ can only see ‘Student’. So far so good, the query I have is will this work/ and even if it does, is it a good or bad idea? Can two/ three people signed on as ‘Teacher’ access the same share/ different shares at the same time? Can 90+ students all signed on as ‘Student’ access shares and save their own files in one big folder? I’m trying to avoid using either 'Student01' – 'Student99' or each students actual name for 90+ students. It’s a Windows flat network (no server) and currently they all sign on to XP (soon to change to Win7) using the names above (‘Principal’, ‘Teacher’, ‘Assistant’, ‘Student’) and the shares are mapped to drive letters.
A lot of people must be in this situation so what is the recommended approach? The admin end of things would be irregular, I do the IT work for the school (my wife is the Principal), so it would be great to not have to do a lot of name and share maintenance – hence the idea of using generic names, but only of it works, obviously. A particular driver for this now is the introduction of Tablets (Windows Surface) which don’t have much storage and the fact that students will most likely access different tablets each time (as a result, the preference is to store any work on the network). Any help greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Aidan.
I’m looking for some generic NAS advice. The scenario is that I have set up a FreeNAS NAS in a small school and so I have a few user names that don’t change much (staff) and a lot of users that would change a lot (students). The question is how best to implement this. My original thinking was to use generic names (‘Administrator’ (i.e. me), ‘Principal’, ‘Teacher’, ‘Assistant’, ‘Student’) and create appropriate shares (using the same names, plus a ‘Common’) with permissions across the different shares. Reading that list from left to right, each one on the left can access each of the ones on their right – so ‘Administrator’ can see all the shares and ‘Student’ can only see ‘Student’. So far so good, the query I have is will this work/ and even if it does, is it a good or bad idea? Can two/ three people signed on as ‘Teacher’ access the same share/ different shares at the same time? Can 90+ students all signed on as ‘Student’ access shares and save their own files in one big folder? I’m trying to avoid using either 'Student01' – 'Student99' or each students actual name for 90+ students. It’s a Windows flat network (no server) and currently they all sign on to XP (soon to change to Win7) using the names above (‘Principal’, ‘Teacher’, ‘Assistant’, ‘Student’) and the shares are mapped to drive letters.
A lot of people must be in this situation so what is the recommended approach? The admin end of things would be irregular, I do the IT work for the school (my wife is the Principal), so it would be great to not have to do a lot of name and share maintenance – hence the idea of using generic names, but only of it works, obviously. A particular driver for this now is the introduction of Tablets (Windows Surface) which don’t have much storage and the fact that students will most likely access different tablets each time (as a result, the preference is to store any work on the network). Any help greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Aidan.