Yeah, I tried Plex for a month and couldn't stand it, I couldn't customize it the way I did with my xbmc builds, it was literally 3x as slow as xbmc, I was having massive issues syncing it across the 6 media boxes in my home so I could just go from room to room and keep watching the same thing (like I can with xbmc). The Plex vs XBMC debate reminds me of iOS vs Android. iOS is great for just working out of the box without wanting to configure and mess around with background stuff (just like Plex) while Android is for someone who doesn't mind breaking shit when they fully customize and configure things (like XBMC). I'm the Dr House of Linux, so I'm find with killing off a few people while perfecting my stuff lol.
Considering modern SSDs are flash based, they suffer the same read/write limitations as a flash drive. The only difference between SSD Flash and USB Flash is quality of the components and implementation of SSD is improved over the cheaper counterparts, however one is the building block of the other and therefore are not really comparable as differentiating technologies as one technology is actually a component of the other. But I do see your point on the storage aspect. If that's the case, I may as well just partition an SSD. If I have an option, why would I purchase 2 SSDs to mirror AND 2 USBs to mirror when I can just purchase 2 SSDs? It's already established it's superior in performance and technology, so if I'm going to get them anyway why not just do it all on them? It seems a bit wasteful to get USBs only for the OS and SSDs only for a database when the SSD is more than capable of both, and if the OS is loaded into RAM and utilized from there, does it matter where it's being loaded from?
Considering modern SSDs are flash based, they suffer the same read/write limitations as a flash drive. The only difference between SSD Flash and USB Flash is quality of the components and implementation of SSD is improved over the cheaper counterparts, however one is the building block of the other and therefore are not really comparable as differentiating technologies as one technology is actually a component of the other. But I do see your point on the storage aspect. If that's the case, I may as well just partition an SSD. If I have an option, why would I purchase 2 SSDs to mirror AND 2 USBs to mirror when I can just purchase 2 SSDs? It's already established it's superior in performance and technology, so if I'm going to get them anyway why not just do it all on them? It seems a bit wasteful to get USBs only for the OS and SSDs only for a database when the SSD is more than capable of both, and if the OS is loaded into RAM and utilized from there, does it matter where it's being loaded from?