I'm not sure why we're arguing about this. But, a retail boxed CPU with bent pins? Come on now. That really would be like getting a new car off the lot, driving it off, and then driving it back with a smashed quarter panel and then you claim that it came off the assembly line that way.
If pins are bent, I'm pretttttttttttttttttty sure that happened after the item left Intel's hands. Each binned item is mounted and tested, which would not be possible if the pins were bent, then the item is reinspected, then packaged in a retail box, then reinspected. Someone in the retail or shipping chain bent the pins, or the end customer. Almost certainly the end customer.
Three things: one, "almost certainly" is a far cry from "irrefutably":
I think the major gap here is your assumption that a bent/broken pin is irrefutably the fault of the end user; I refute that :p
Two: In none of the processors or motherboards that I have purchased have the pins or contacts been visible from outside the sealed packaging, meaning there's no way to verify their condition prior to purchase and opening of the packaging. A smashed quarter panel on a car is observable with visual inspection, something that you are required (at least here, anyway) to do prior to accepting delivery of the vehicle, and you sign off on the fact that you have inspected the vehicle and are content with its condition. For a comparable analogy, you need something that is not observable from the visual inspection, like driving off the lot and finding that the brakes don't work.
Aside: this is why analogies are bad: they abstract the discussion and bring with them a whole new set of assumptions on both parties, and merely muddy the waters; plus most people grab the first analogy they can think of without thinking it all the way through.
Three: I don't know why we're arguing either; @cyberjock made an incredible (literally, in that I find it not credible) claim Intel should not honour warranty on damaged contacts, despite this violating the social contract of modern capitalistic business practices. I would have to look them up, but I am almost positive that there are laws in place to protect consumers against receiving defective goods from the manufacturer. It was almost certainly a hyperbolic comment, but he posed the question so I answered.