Lyndon Drake
Cadet
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2013
- Messages
- 6
First off, I want to say a huge thank you to everyone who has contributed to FreeNAS. I had a drive fail, and replacing it went completely smoothly. No data loss — the whole process was entirely straightforward. Thank you all!
I also have a question, which I'm sure is straightforward but for which I cannot find the answer. I apologise if this is because I've failed to understand, but I have read through the documentation and can't figure it all out.
I can't figure out why my free space is so much less than I would expect, based on how much space is used, on my Z2 pool (made up of four 2T disks):
[root@tirith] ~# zpool list remote
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE EXPANDSZ FRAG CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
remote 7.25T 5.99T 1.26T - 6% 82% 1.00x ONLINE /mnt
[root@tirith] ~# zfs list remote
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
remote 2.90T 515G 512K /mnt/remote
[root@tirith] ~#
The 2.9T used is about what I'd expect from what I can see stored on the drive. So I can't figure out why the ALLOC column in zpool list is so much greater. Any thoughts
I also have a question, which I'm sure is straightforward but for which I cannot find the answer. I apologise if this is because I've failed to understand, but I have read through the documentation and can't figure it all out.
I can't figure out why my free space is so much less than I would expect, based on how much space is used, on my Z2 pool (made up of four 2T disks):
[root@tirith] ~# zpool list remote
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE EXPANDSZ FRAG CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
remote 7.25T 5.99T 1.26T - 6% 82% 1.00x ONLINE /mnt
[root@tirith] ~# zfs list remote
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
remote 2.90T 515G 512K /mnt/remote
[root@tirith] ~#
The 2.9T used is about what I'd expect from what I can see stored on the drive. So I can't figure out why the ALLOC column in zpool list is so much greater. Any thoughts