Hi,
I've been using FreeNAS for a few months to store some non-critical data and time-machine backups. All of the data on my FreeNAS machine is backed up offsite and I don't use any kind of RAID.
I've been running this all on a custom build G3420 (Pentium; 3.2 GHz; Dual core) with 16 GB of RAM and two 4 TB hard disks. Given that the data is non-critical, and given the stark warnings against using non-ECC RAM with ZFS, I opted for UFS.
Now that FreeNAS 9.3 has been released, UFS is no longer an option. My long term choices therefore seem to be:
- Move to ZFS
- Move to other software
My hardware isn't best-suited for ZFS, which is why I'm considering moving on. However, it's just a "home use" machine (max 2 users) and I'm therefore curious as to whether I'll really suffer with non-ECC RAM, especially if I'm not doing any kind of RAID or encryption.
Thoughts?
I've been using FreeNAS for a few months to store some non-critical data and time-machine backups. All of the data on my FreeNAS machine is backed up offsite and I don't use any kind of RAID.
I've been running this all on a custom build G3420 (Pentium; 3.2 GHz; Dual core) with 16 GB of RAM and two 4 TB hard disks. Given that the data is non-critical, and given the stark warnings against using non-ECC RAM with ZFS, I opted for UFS.
Now that FreeNAS 9.3 has been released, UFS is no longer an option. My long term choices therefore seem to be:
- Move to ZFS
- Move to other software
My hardware isn't best-suited for ZFS, which is why I'm considering moving on. However, it's just a "home use" machine (max 2 users) and I'm therefore curious as to whether I'll really suffer with non-ECC RAM, especially if I'm not doing any kind of RAID or encryption.
Thoughts?