danb35
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 15,504
Wondering what thought process went into setting the warning thresholds for netdata, as it seems like I'm getting lots of warnings in my email for things that shouldn't be a concern at all. For example, RAM utilization > 90%. Is that a problem? Is it not rather to be expected when ZFS caches so aggressively? And disk utilization > 90%? Again, it seems like that would be expected when a scrub is running. I had a couple dozen netdata alerts in my admin email this afternoon, and they were all of this sort. Why does the system think I should care?