Hi there,
I'm going to be putting together a FreeNAS box over the next few weeks to accomplish several tasks, the main job is to be a media server box. It needs to run various servers (most of these appear to be FreeBSD compatible, please correct me if I'm wrong). Sabnzbd, Sickbeard, CouchPotato, Air Video Server (for remote iOS video streaming) and an SQL server to sync up XBMC libraries between multiple jail broken Apple TVs (I don't know how to achieve this yet!).
The main crux of my question is this, based on my hard drives (will list below and don't want to buy new ones right now thanks to Thailand I'll be waiting till 2tb is sub £70 again) what options do I have regarding maximum storage space vs full redundancy?
I understand RAID5 requires matching drives, so that is probably out of the question. I've read many posts regarding raidz and that looks promising. My ideal world consists of a raid5 style % loss of space vs redundancy with the ability to be able to add drives over time to the array without having to destroy the array and start from scratch. watching an old episode of systm (pre runner to tekzilla) they mentioned unraid which uses the largest drive for parity data on the rest. Looks ok but what other options does ZFS and raidz give me. Pros vs cons.
Currently I own 2x 1tb, 1x 1.5tb and one 500gb drive. New drives will be added eventually - I just can't bring myself to pay 3x prices from last year. It hurts. i haven't yet purchased the mobo or CPU yet so suggestions welcomed (bear in mind it will be doing some transcoding some i3 is currently in my mind).
To recap, I want a raid5 style system using around 33% of the available space for parity but that I can add to whenever and without data loss.
I'm going to be putting together a FreeNAS box over the next few weeks to accomplish several tasks, the main job is to be a media server box. It needs to run various servers (most of these appear to be FreeBSD compatible, please correct me if I'm wrong). Sabnzbd, Sickbeard, CouchPotato, Air Video Server (for remote iOS video streaming) and an SQL server to sync up XBMC libraries between multiple jail broken Apple TVs (I don't know how to achieve this yet!).
The main crux of my question is this, based on my hard drives (will list below and don't want to buy new ones right now thanks to Thailand I'll be waiting till 2tb is sub £70 again) what options do I have regarding maximum storage space vs full redundancy?
I understand RAID5 requires matching drives, so that is probably out of the question. I've read many posts regarding raidz and that looks promising. My ideal world consists of a raid5 style % loss of space vs redundancy with the ability to be able to add drives over time to the array without having to destroy the array and start from scratch. watching an old episode of systm (pre runner to tekzilla) they mentioned unraid which uses the largest drive for parity data on the rest. Looks ok but what other options does ZFS and raidz give me. Pros vs cons.
Currently I own 2x 1tb, 1x 1.5tb and one 500gb drive. New drives will be added eventually - I just can't bring myself to pay 3x prices from last year. It hurts. i haven't yet purchased the mobo or CPU yet so suggestions welcomed (bear in mind it will be doing some transcoding some i3 is currently in my mind).
To recap, I want a raid5 style system using around 33% of the available space for parity but that I can add to whenever and without data loss.