tbaror
Contributor
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2013
- Messages
- 105
Hello All
I am currently testing some prof of concept for our builders to write high speed SVN dev many small files while compiling.
i used server with following spec:
Build FreeNAS 9.3-BETA GMT
Platform Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5504 @ 2.00GHz
Memory 49061MB
Disks 6X250GB seagate Created raidz , +1x 480 ocz vertex460 zil + 1x 480 ocz vertex460 l2arc
Nework 1 x gbe console
Nework 1x 10 gbe storage
iscsi file extent reside on same volume where cifs writes
I tried to do some svn operation with batch getlib and bin with cifs its takes 1.30 min with iscsi 7 sec with size of around 50mb
next i xcopy this out folder to same storage to out1 folder again with cifs its takes around 1 min with iscsi its takes 11 sec
i tested both with crystal mark i get in both around same results around 340MB/s sequential and 100Mb random
simple dd gives
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/zvol1/temp.dat bs=4k count=250000
250000+0 records in
250000+0 records out
1024000000 bytes transferred in 2.810265 secs (364378471 bytes/sec)
I noticed that the size on disk with cifs is x70 biger than actual size when in iscsi is x1.x
My question why its much slower in cifs than iscsi and why space on disk is such huge?
Thanks
I am currently testing some prof of concept for our builders to write high speed SVN dev many small files while compiling.
i used server with following spec:
Build FreeNAS 9.3-BETA GMT
Platform Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5504 @ 2.00GHz
Memory 49061MB
Disks 6X250GB seagate Created raidz , +1x 480 ocz vertex460 zil + 1x 480 ocz vertex460 l2arc
Nework 1 x gbe console
Nework 1x 10 gbe storage
iscsi file extent reside on same volume where cifs writes
I tried to do some svn operation with batch getlib and bin with cifs its takes 1.30 min with iscsi 7 sec with size of around 50mb
next i xcopy this out folder to same storage to out1 folder again with cifs its takes around 1 min with iscsi its takes 11 sec
i tested both with crystal mark i get in both around same results around 340MB/s sequential and 100Mb random
simple dd gives
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/zvol1/temp.dat bs=4k count=250000
250000+0 records in
250000+0 records out
1024000000 bytes transferred in 2.810265 secs (364378471 bytes/sec)
I noticed that the size on disk with cifs is x70 biger than actual size when in iscsi is x1.x
My question why its much slower in cifs than iscsi and why space on disk is such huge?
Thanks