of courseThe comment about zfs storage drivers is if you intended to run docker with zfs on Linux. I assume you are talking about NFS within a docker VM running on FreeNAS.
Why the hell does Docker need a filesystem driver? It has no business interacting with any filesystem through anything beyond syscalls.
Why the hell does Docker need a filesystem driver? It has no business interacting with any filesystem through anything beyond syscalls.
On ZFS docker implements it’s containers using snapshots and clones.
On other file systems it might use directory overlays.
Sure, that's a good thing to do.I don't think it's a "driver" in the traditional sense of the word. I think it's just an interface that allows the docker daemon to understand use features of zfs in managing docker containers efficiently.
I saw a heap of bugs loggged for 11.1 about 3 weeks ago and the list is mysteriously lower now. I am guessing we're doing an alpha / rc kind of thing now for it.
Will 11.1 still ship with docker? I'm (more than) happy to wait for it, rather than have it rushed.
I don't understand this compulsion with pushing stuff to the next version, to the next version over and over, just so they can increment the number and still hit milestones for releases.It's been pushed to 11.2, a number of things were pushed to 11.2.
What does this ultimately mean?
What does this ultimately mean?
Thanks Josh.
All it means is that they have finalized what docker host software they intend to use (RancherOS). Now they need to build a pre-canned bhyve virtual machine to download and install, along with all the front end work on the FreeNAS UI side to tie it all together.
Still means you probably won't see Docker until 11.2 at the minimum, maybe even further out like 11.3.
So I jumped to unRaid.
Mate, I have been using the pluginjails for years, succesfully. Somewhat. Upgrading is often screwed up.
Also, I'm doing things out of the ordinary with multiple nasses. Mapping & sharing drives isn't all that 'native'. It's scripting & scripting.
I just wanted to check out docker, kubernetes, rancher & bhyve. The dynamic docker volumes approach - I thought - was the way to go. Turns out it's not mature at all. If you ask me, I'd not use it in a production environment for years to come.
Brave man, screw that!I am still on Corral and waiting it out.