BUILD 3 bays only - what drives to use

Status
Not open for further replies.

CaCtus491

Cadet
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Messages
2
I'm looking at evaluating FreeNAS as a storage backend for XenServer via iSCSI. For storage, I have two nodes available as part of a SuperMicro Twin2 chassis. Each node has a single Xeon E5620 processor, 16GB ECC RAM and 6x gigabit Ethernet interfaces.

The intention is to iSCSI multipath over at least 4 of the interfaces - I read that this would be a better option than bonding the interfaces together via LACP.

The killer here though, is that each of the two nodes only has 3 drive bays. Currently these are configured with 1x 16GB SSD (boot) and 2x 2TB 7200RPM drives. Would I be best here to drop in a new SSD ~240GB (for L2ARC, or ZIL, or both if possible?) and move to a reliable USB flash drive to boot FreeNAS? The 2x 2TB drives (which I may replace for 4TB drives) should be presented as plain drives, which would then be mirrored in software as part of a VDev?

I guess there is always the option to add a PCIe card and external enclosure for expansion in the future.

Finally, the ultimate intent is to configure these two nodes and present them to XenServer so that in case either FreeNAS node fails, we can continue on from a recentish copy of each VM. One way to achieve this would be to keep both FreeNAS systems completely separate, using XenServer to periodically snapshot each VM, storing the snapshot on the second FreeNAS box, but I wonder if there is a better way someone could point me towards, using FreeNAS directly?
 

CaCtus491

Cadet
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Messages
2
Ok, so after coming across http://forums.freenas.org/threads/slideshow-explaining-vdev-zpool-zil-and-l2arc-for-noobs.7775/, I guess I don't want to buy a new SSD at this stage, rather I should buy more RAM.

If I understand correctly:
  • Another 16GB of RAM would work better as it leaves more space for the ARC, and simply do away with L2ARC.
  • The existing 16GB SLC SSD would be sufficient for a ZIL, to improve write performance for sync writes by the Xen VMs (there are a few databases)
  • Because the ZIL is not mirrored, there is a risk of data loss on failure of the ZIL SSD
  • For future expansion, I should look at an external enclosure which would allow me to have a mirror ZIL, plus create VDevs with more drives to support something better than simply mirroring.
  • I should do more research with regards to using iSCSI as there are potential performance issues with iSCSI + ZFS
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top