Artion
Patron
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2016
- Messages
- 331
Hi, I'm trying to figure out the differences (benefits/drawbacks) of the two configurations in the topic. Any help is welcome.
Used this for some comparison and comes out that there is a difference of just 3% in space allocation in favor to the 2 vdev Z1 configuration (61,28% vs 58,36% usable space over the raw space - taking in account a 20% free space for optimal ZFS operation).
But I need some feedback from real use cases concerning reliability and speed/throughput of these configurations.
(PS.: Does the 2 vdev Z1 configuration tolerate 1 disk failure per vdev or just 1 disk failure per pool? This is worth reading.)
Used this for some comparison and comes out that there is a difference of just 3% in space allocation in favor to the 2 vdev Z1 configuration (61,28% vs 58,36% usable space over the raw space - taking in account a 20% free space for optimal ZFS operation).
But I need some feedback from real use cases concerning reliability and speed/throughput of these configurations.
(PS.: Does the 2 vdev Z1 configuration tolerate 1 disk failure per vdev or just 1 disk failure per pool? This is worth reading.)
Last edited: