FreeNAS-11.2-U5 is failing to create a jail

[dpengel3]

I have FreeNAS-11.2-U5 (updated from 11.2-U4). I've not created any jails or installed any plugins yet.

When I try to create a jail through the UI wizard, it results in the following:

FAILED
[('SSL routines', 'SSL3_GET_RECORD', 'decryption failed or bad record mac')]

Expanding the "More info" indicator reveals this:

Error: concurrent.futures.process._RemoteTraceback:
"""
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/concurrent/futures/process.py", line 175, in _process_worker
r = call_item.fn(*call_item.args, **call_item.kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/middlewared/worker.py", line 133, in main_worker
res = loop.run_until_complete(coro)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/asyncio/base_events.py", line 484, in run_until_complete
return future.result()
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/middlewared/worker.py", line 93, in _run
return await self._call(name, serviceobj, methodobj, params=args, job=job)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/middlewared/worker.py", line 85, in _call
return methodobj(*params)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/middlewared/worker.py", line 85, in _call
return methodobj(*params)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/middlewared/plugins/jail.py", line 194, in create_job
'jail.fetch', {"release": release}, job=True
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/middlewared/worker.py", line 105, in call_sync
return self.client.call(method, *params, timeout=timeout, **kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/middlewared/client/client.py", line 477, in call
raise ClientException(job['error'], trace=job['exception'])
middlewared.client.client.ClientException: [('SSL routines', 'SSL3_GET_RECORD', 'decryption failed or bad record mac')]
"""

The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/middlewared/job.py", line 332, in run
await self.future
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/middlewared/job.py", line 358, in __run_body
rv = await self.middleware._call_worker(self.method_name, *self.args, job={'id': self.id})
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/middlewared/main.py", line 1063, in _call_worker
return await self.run_in_proc(main_worker, name, args, job)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/middlewared/main.py", line 997, in run_in_proc
return await self.run_in_executor(self.__procpool, method, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/middlewared/main.py", line 973, in run_in_executor
return await loop.run_in_executor(pool, functools.partial(method, *args, **kwargs))
middlewared.client.client.ClientException: [('SSL routines', 'SSL3_GET_RECORD', 'decryption failed or bad record mac')]

I'm running on a Proliant Microserver Gen10. Here's the system information from the dashboard:

OS Version:
FreeNAS-11.2-U5
(Build Date: Jun 24, 2019 18:41)

Processor:
AMD Opteron(tm) X3421 APU (4 cores)

Memory:
7 GiB

I could not find any descriptions of similar problems, either in google search or in the forums. Has anyone seen anything like this? Is there something that might have been incomplete when it performed the update?

Thank you in advance for any information.

 

[dlavigne]

Please create a report at bugs.ixsystems.com and post the issue number here.

 

[dpengel3]

Please create a report at bugs.ixsystems.com and post the issue number here.

Will do. (I was hoping there was something obvious I had not done, that someone would recognize. I'm very new using FreeNAS.)

 

[dpengel3]

Well, after registering on the bug system, I found issue NAS-101300. It's not exactly the same error I was getting, but applying the fix from that seemed to address the issue.

One other thing I noticed: It looks like you're supposed to be able to set a gateway IP address while setting up a jail. But it doesn't offer anywhere to enter it (the words "IPv4 Default Router" are there, but clicking on them doesn't open a text box, like the other controls do.) Is this expected, or should it get a bug report?