dell t20 will be here

Status
Not open for further replies.

johnathan

Cadet
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1
i purchased a dell t20 (pentium) purchased another 8gb ecc stick. anyway. im planning on starting with 2 3tb wd reds. in a mirror eventually im wanting to get another 2 3tb and rebuild in a raidz1 is that optimal? its just going to have pictures, programs, and computer backups.
 

nojohnny101

Wizard
Joined
Dec 3, 2015
Messages
1,478
I suspect you have not gotten any responses yet because what you asked is a "loaded question". What I mean is the immediate answer would be "it depends". It depends on the following:

- How much do you care about the data you have on the NAS?
- You do have a backup correct?
- What type of performance do you need?

Someone asked a similar question recently and there is relevant discussion there you could read through for deciding between raidz level or running mirrors.
See here: https://forums.freenas.org/index.php?threads/the-case-for-mirrors.46371/
 
Joined
Mar 22, 2016
Messages
217
RaidZ1 is not recommended for drives larger than 1TB.

So based on that alone, it is probably not optimal. With 4 drives Mirriors or RaidZ2 would provide the same amount of space. Mirrors will provide better performance.
 

Mlovelace

Guru
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
1,111
You will find most people are unconfortable with raidz1 when you get into drive sizes of 2TB+. I don't find it to be an unacceptable solution in the 3TB - 4TB drive size, with the caveat that, it is not the only copy of the data. There is no level of array redundancy that replaces having a backup of your data, period, no matter the raidz level you run.
 

Stux

MVP
Joined
Jun 2, 2016
Messages
4,419
Sweating bullets on a 4x3TB RAID5 rebuild convinced me to go for raid6/z2 in the future ;)

(In the end, after 5 days of rebuilding it did recover btw)
 

IceBoosteR

Guru
Joined
Sep 27, 2016
Messages
503
i purchased a dell t20 (pentium) purchased another 8gb ecc stick. anyway. im planning on starting with 2 3tb wd reds. in a mirror eventually im wanting to get another 2 3tb and rebuild in a raidz1 is that optimal? its just going to have pictures, programs, and computer backups.
Do you want to destroy your first pool and throw all 4x3TB disks in one RAIDZ1 pool together? Then you will losse all data on your first pool. Or do you want 2x2x3TB drive pools? If you plan for a backup, then definitely go with another system for that.


Sweating bullets on a 4x3TB RAID5 rebuild convinced me to go for raid6/z2 in the future ;)

(In the end, after 5 days of rebuilding it did recover btw)

Did you loose one disk in your RAIDZ1 pool and you aborted the recreation of the pool after 5 days?
That sounds horrible...
 

Mlovelace

Guru
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
1,111
Sweating bullets on a 4x3TB RAID5 rebuild convinced me to go for raid6/z2 in the future ;)

(In the end, after 5 days of rebuilding it did recover btw)
Why would you be sweating bullets, unless you don't have a backup of the data?o_O
 

Stux

MVP
Joined
Jun 2, 2016
Messages
4,419
Why would you be sweating bullets, unless you don't have a backup of the data?o_O

I forget the exact details. I believe I was restoring from backup after the primary had failed, and it was the backup that was a raid5, and that degraded.

At this stage I wasn't running continuous offsite backups.
 
Last edited:

Stux

MVP
Joined
Jun 2, 2016
Messages
4,419
Do you want to destroy your first pool and throw all 4x3TB disks in one RAIDZ1 pool together? Then you will losse all data on your first pool. Or do you want 2x2x3TB drive pools? If you plan for a backup, then definitely go with another system for that.




Did you loose one disk in your RAIDZ1 pool and you aborted the recreation of the pool after 5 days?
That sounds horrible...

This was not ZFS. It was a drobo 2nd gen.

As it turns out, those drobos, although they did support 3TB drives, something goes very wrong when you upgrade from 4x2TB to 4x3TB. I suspect they don't have enough RAM to cover it and their performance dives.

Anyway after a long rebuild it recovered fully. But I would've rather had additional redundancy.

This was provided later by a Drobo 5D with double parity.

We've outgrown that solution now and it came down to acquiring another drobo or something else.

I wasn't happy with the opacity of drobo and didn't want to invest more in drobos

FreeNAS/ZFS RAIDZ2 is the solution I've gone with. I prefer knowing what's happening... are scrubs happening? What about smart? Is bitrot taken care of?
 
Last edited:

IceBoosteR

Guru
Joined
Sep 27, 2016
Messages
503
This was not ZFS. It was a drobo 2nd gen.


FreeNAS/ZFS RAIDZ2 is the solution I've gone with. I prefer knowing what's happening... are scrubs happening? What about smart? Is bitrot taken care of?
Definitely agree with that point. A little bit more administration for more features and a safe feeling for your data ;)
But lets wait for the thread creator to come back to his thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top