bhyve VNC port already in use.

[spacecabbie]

I cannot access 2 of my vm's via vnc (web or client)
the log files show:

Code:

/usr/sbin/bhyve -c cpus=8,sockets=2,cores=2,threads=2 -m 4096 -A -w -H -s 0:0,hostbridge -l bootrom,/usr/local/share/uefi-firmware/BHYVE_UEFI.fd -s 4:0,ahci,cd:/mnt/**/general/**.iso,hd:/dev/zvol/**/**/**_VM-9xvca -s 31,lpc -s 2:0,ahci -s 3:0,e1000,tap1,mac=00:a0:98:04:26:91 -l com1,/dev/nmdm7A **_VM
Assertion failed: (error == 0), function emulate_inout, file /data/workspace/TrueNAS_Releng_13.0/freenas/_BE/os/usr.sbin/bhyve/inout.c, line 234.
/usr/sbin/bhyve -c cpus=8,sockets=2,cores=2,threads=2 -m 4096 -A -w -H -s 0:0,hostbridge -l bootrom,/usr/local/share/uefi-firmware/BHYVE_UEFI.fd -s 4:0,ahci,cd:/mnt/**/general/**.iso,hd:/dev/zvol/**/**/**_VM-9xvca -s 30:0,xhci,tablet -s 31,lpc -s 2:0,ahci -s 3:0,e1000,tap1,mac=00:a0:98:04:26:91 -l com1,/dev/nmdm7A -s 29,fbuf,vncserver,tcp=0.0.0.0:5902,w=1024,h=768 **_VM
29/03/2022 01:34:00 ListenOnTCPPort: Address already in use

ports open

Code:

root     bhyve      2354  9  tcp4   127.0.0.1:5900        *:*
root     bhyve      2354  15 tcp4   127.0.0.1:5900        127.0.0.1:16228

1th vm (5900) works but 2 and 3th 5901 / 5902 do not and I cannot see any diverance in configs.

Also port range 58* or 59* are not in use.

Any idea's ?

 

[sretalla]

-l com1,/dev/nmdm7A

That's the bit that's used twice.

I don't see a way to modify it for an existing VM... how did you create them? did you do some kind of copy/clone?

I guess the way to fix it would be to delete the VM(s) and create a new one with the same settings pointing at the same zvol(s).

 

[spacecabbie]

That's the bit that's used twice.

I don't see a way to modify it for an existing VM... how did you create them? did you do some kind of copy/clone?

I guess the way to fix it would be to delete the VM(s) and create a new one with the same settings pointing at the same zvol(s).

I changed it and still I get this error. even recreating a new vm wil not work on vnc

 

[sretalla]

Seems the MAC addresses are duplicate on the TAP... maybe that's something to look at.