No, but the technology will be resolving itself anyways. What we've seen over the past decade of ZFS development is maybe a tenfold increase in performance of a "typical" server, combined with a much larger increase in the amount of regular memory that a typical machine can hold.
ZFS has a fundamental issue in that the designers recognized that CPU was a lot faster than spinny rust storage, and they assumed that the combination of CPU plus RAM could be leveraged to "make disk go faster". That's conditionally true, and the history of disk drives over the last several decades shows no signs of resolving the overall trend of seek speeds dominating I/O within the hardware. No matter what, ZFS is going to remain a kick-ass way to manage the stuff you're putting on spinning platters, because the resource investment to run ZFS is rapidly getting much less expensive while the significant HDD factors remain almost exactly the same.
But that turns into a handicap when you look at SSD. ZFS is, overall, a big massive software package that is highly dependent on disk drives being slow in order to make itself look good. As CPU and memory continue to increase, the rise of flash storage is happening at a similar rate of improvement; SSD can go very fast and ZFS can't keep up. There are some mitigating factors that I believe will be critical in the coming decade:
1) We saw a rapid progression from 10Mbps->100Mbps->1000Mbps (1993, 1996, 1999) networking, but it's now 2015 and 10GbE isn't really "here" yet. The growth of baseline networking speeds has slowed to a crawl. Without substantially faster networks, system speeds are already sufficient to saturate multiple 1Gbps Ethernet in many scenarios. You can already buy a CPU that'll do that for 10GbE too.
2) Flash devices continue to get bigger; I saw SanDisk 960GB units being sold for $199 on Black Friday. As these units get bigger, the amount of time it takes to empty and fill them increases, which tends to be a factor that favors a somewhat slower but much smarter storage system.
3) CPU and RAM will continue to increase. Ten years ago, a fast CPU was about 1/20th of a decent fast CPU today, and 8GB of RAM was $2000. Today, 256GB of RAM is $2000. In the next decade, it's reasonable to expect to see similar improvements.
The improvements in CPU and RAM work fairly effectively against the other two factors to help favor ZFS over time. There are also things that can be done to make ZFS more SSD-friendly, but the things such as automatic tiering that would be most useful aren't likely to make it into ZFS without some large corporate sponsor (and prolly bprw). Fortunately it does look like we'll be getting some similar benefits with things such as persistent L2ARC which are in the works.